
| Starting at the boiler, we survey the entire steam system and compile a report based on data collected. The report divides the system into plant areas for easy customer reference and includes: (1) Survey Notes Indicating System Problems and Remedies; (2) General and Specific Location of Required Venturi; (3) Inlet and Return Pressure; (4) Heat Transfer Data; (5) Venturi Size Per Location and (6) Assembly Required. Documentation is such that sizing (for later additions and modifications) can usually be handled by phone. |
|
(1) BOILER ROOM Record Steam Pressure, Header Traps and Return Pressure. (2) OVERALL SYSTEM Record
Individual Steam Trap Location, Condensate and Piping. (3) TRACINGFor
plants with outside tracing lines, we review inlets & outlets,
eliminate unnecessary traps and inefficient parts. (4) FUEL SAVINGS ESTIMATES In
estimating fuel savings (cost per 1000 lbs of steam), we utilize existing
system information: (1) Pressure drops from Main Header to
E.O.L; (2) Return Line
Temperatures; (3) Type of
System; (4) Steam Pressure;
(5) Average Condensate Load Per Trap;
(6) Customer Maintenance Schedule. We then compare the resulting steam loss calculations (lb/hr)
to the system’s projected performance using Enercon units. These
estimates consistently prove to be accurate.
They do not include savings from the elimination of trap repair and
replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
n
n n n
n
n |
| NAVY’S 30-YEAR COMMITMENT TO FIXED ORIFICE TRAPS | |
|
Fixed
orifice technology gained credibility in the early 60’s, when the U.S.
Navy began looking for ways to keep ships at sea longer.
The Navy studied steam trapping techniques, steam trap operation
and maintenance. The Steam Trap Handbook (James F. McCauley pub. 1995), says “researchers reasoned if a fixed size orifice was used to pass only the |
|
| quantity
of condensate produced, then steam emitted from the orifice, under
conditions when no condensate was present, would be minimal.
“This steam
loss, although minute, is greater than that encountered if a properly
functioning conventional steam trap were in its place.
However, Navy experience with conventional steam traps has been
poor; even though maintenance was stressed and preventive maintenance
systems and procedures rigidly employed.” Mr.
McCauley points out that the Navy is concerned with reliability and energy
efficiency; that a ship cannot depend on manufacturer's services at sea.
“Optimally,’ he says, “they want equipment that will function
reliably... Reliability,
however, is not the only consideration in operating a vessel underweigh.
The distance the ship can travel without replenishing its fuel is
probably the second most important factor, since steam utilization is
directly proportional to fuel consumption. “The
Navy was impressed with the researchers’ work with the orifice steam
trap. After a pilot program on a major combatant ship, the decision
was made to outfit the entire fossil-fueled fleet of over 300 ships with
this unique device. After more than thirty years of
use the orifice steam trap is still used exclusively in the fleet.
Results have been more than satisfactory.” One
of Enercon’s Independent Distributors, a decorated 30-year U.S. Naval
Officer holding an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a B.S. in Electrical
Engineering, was closely involved with the fixed orifice during the time
the Navy was converting its fleet to this technology.
|
|
Magazine
Articles and Case Histories
TIMBER PROCESSING MAGAZINE,
‘Boise
Cascade Finds Major Energy Savings with Enercon Product’
January/February 2006 Issue, Page 30
TIMBER PROCESSING MAGAZINE,
‘Permanent
Steam Traps Do The Job’
July/August 2004 Issue, Page 18
‘$128,000
Savings Claim Isn’t Blowing Steam’
Sept./Oct. 2001 Issue, Page 27
FINISHER'S MANAGEMENT MAGAZINE
‘Ensuring
Energy Efficiency: A Look at
Energy
Conservation in Finishing Shops’
‘Enercon
System Cuts Plater Steam Costs’
March 2002 Issue, Page 17
Click
for steam related literature dating back to 1940.
Warranty
|
Enercon
Systems Company unconditionally guarantees its condensate removal unit
against defects in material and
workmanship, venturi wear, and wire draw
while it is the property of the original owner. It does not cover the labor, material or other costs related to cleaning or installing them. If such defects or
damages occur, Enercon will replace said unit(s) free of charge. This
warranty covers the Condensate Removal Unit only; not the Y-strainer, blowdown valve or
other parts of the Enercon assembly. This warranty applies to normal use and not to
intentional damage, improper piping or unreasonable use. In honoring this warranty,
Enercon’s responsibility covers replacing
defective condensate removal units only, not for labor, material or other
costs related to installing them. On full conversions (all qualifying mechanical traps replaced) Enercon will exchange and resize for a nominal fee (currently $30.00 U.S. per unit plus shipping) standard venturis (1/2", 3/4" & 1") that must be replaced due to steam system modification, expansion or process changes while they are the property of the original owner. This exchange policy covers the venturi only. Any other part of the assembly that needs to be replaced will be billed at current prices. |
Copyright© 2006 Enercon Systems Co. All
Rights Reserved.